Nicolas Jaar's new album Space Is Only Noise is officially due out Feburary 14, but has been available for download on filesharing sites (like this one) for a few weeks now. In fact, I bet most of you have it already.
So, is it any good?
A dark artistic album with high-end production, smooth keys, lazy beats, near-perfect percussion and relaxing ambient background noise is admittedly hard not to like. Jaar's talent (and penchant for melancholic chords amidst clean beats) is certainly as obvious as it ever was - his now signature style is even more ingrained with this effort. He took the LP seriously, and instead of filling it with a collection of finished independent songs, he created a cohesive album seemingly designed to play seamlessly from start to finish. Stressing transition, cohesion, and narrative Jaar included 2 - 3 transition pieces (depending on who you ask) and let the first song basically be the last.
For the most part it worked and I am impressed and happy with the album. With the exception of a few songs it has been a nice soundtrack to rainy bus rides, smokey traffic jams and tipsy billiard games. However, it is not without, nor beyond critique. I will now take issue with the ideas that the album is under-developed and could have done without Jaar's singing and lyrics.
But here is one of the better songs the on the album (despite the unneeded chatter) to listen to while you read.
So, is it any good?
A dark artistic album with high-end production, smooth keys, lazy beats, near-perfect percussion and relaxing ambient background noise is admittedly hard not to like. Jaar's talent (and penchant for melancholic chords amidst clean beats) is certainly as obvious as it ever was - his now signature style is even more ingrained with this effort. He took the LP seriously, and instead of filling it with a collection of finished independent songs, he created a cohesive album seemingly designed to play seamlessly from start to finish. Stressing transition, cohesion, and narrative Jaar included 2 - 3 transition pieces (depending on who you ask) and let the first song basically be the last.
For the most part it worked and I am impressed and happy with the album. With the exception of a few songs it has been a nice soundtrack to rainy bus rides, smokey traffic jams and tipsy billiard games. However, it is not without, nor beyond critique. I will now take issue with the ideas that the album is under-developed and could have done without Jaar's singing and lyrics.
But here is one of the better songs the on the album (despite the unneeded chatter) to listen to while you read.
It seems the danger in the transitioned LP approach stems from the potential to leave tracks largely under-developed. Tracks like Almost Fell, Variations, Specters of the Future and even Colomb could have easily benefited from some more attention - mainly in extending and developing. Having those tracks more developed certainly wouldn't have taken away from the albums arc, and if done right, would not kill the leaving-us-wanting-more feeling that great short songs seem intent on.
Was Jaar just too focused on the overall mix, was he being pressured, was he trying to maximize the leaving-us-wanting-more feeling or was he trying to capitalize on his musical fragments?
I have already addressed the former, and seeing that the album is released on the relaxed left-field Circus Company we ought rule out the pressure idea and consider the 'leave-us-wanting-more' suggestion. If that is to be the reason, in my eyes the tactic annoys me more than leaves me wanting more, for the album becomes less like an actual album and more like a collection of fragments strung together - which is fine if that's what he wanted to create, but I have the feeling that shouldn't a debut album have more substance than that?! Perhaps then he was simply trying to capitalize on a collection of fragments. This seems the most likely possibility, in-spite of the easy and weak, 'it's just art man, relax' defense available. Understanding his musical ability means understanding that his fragments are better than most and can probably pass for songs if arranged appropriately. For Jaar, this realization is dangerous for it would evidence egotistical tenancies and not financial trouble.
If Jaar was as into letting people remix his work as he is into remixing other people's work, I wouldn't be so stuck up on the fragment issue because I could eagerly await a remix package. However, Jaar does not invite in remixers (although Kasper Bjork told me he will be the first to do it). This concern can now lend itself to the deeper egoism concern in the sense that we may rightly ask why he wont allow remixes? Is he forgetting his own advice and buying into his hype?
This deeper concern has been a growing impression and can be grounded in other troubling aspects of the album.
For starters, considering Jaar's musical connections and growing pocketbook, why did Jaar take it upon himself to sing on the album? He certainly doesn't have a great voice, and while his lazy ramblings can be said to fit somewhat to the music, I could easily envision many other vocalists fitting equally or better and more pleasantly to his music. This awkwardness is most noticeable on Too Many Kids Finding Rain In The Dust and Space Is Only Noise If You Can See. His voice gets by on Problems With the Sun, but only because it's pitched down so much, but to the point where I wonder if a simple baritone wouldn't have been a better fit. Whats worse, and has me skipping through these three songs, is that his lyrics are mere background at best and meaningless at worst.
Was Jaar just too focused on the overall mix, was he being pressured, was he trying to maximize the leaving-us-wanting-more feeling or was he trying to capitalize on his musical fragments?
I have already addressed the former, and seeing that the album is released on the relaxed left-field Circus Company we ought rule out the pressure idea and consider the 'leave-us-wanting-more' suggestion. If that is to be the reason, in my eyes the tactic annoys me more than leaves me wanting more, for the album becomes less like an actual album and more like a collection of fragments strung together - which is fine if that's what he wanted to create, but I have the feeling that shouldn't a debut album have more substance than that?! Perhaps then he was simply trying to capitalize on a collection of fragments. This seems the most likely possibility, in-spite of the easy and weak, 'it's just art man, relax' defense available. Understanding his musical ability means understanding that his fragments are better than most and can probably pass for songs if arranged appropriately. For Jaar, this realization is dangerous for it would evidence egotistical tenancies and not financial trouble.
If Jaar was as into letting people remix his work as he is into remixing other people's work, I wouldn't be so stuck up on the fragment issue because I could eagerly await a remix package. However, Jaar does not invite in remixers (although Kasper Bjork told me he will be the first to do it). This concern can now lend itself to the deeper egoism concern in the sense that we may rightly ask why he wont allow remixes? Is he forgetting his own advice and buying into his hype?
This deeper concern has been a growing impression and can be grounded in other troubling aspects of the album.
For starters, considering Jaar's musical connections and growing pocketbook, why did Jaar take it upon himself to sing on the album? He certainly doesn't have a great voice, and while his lazy ramblings can be said to fit somewhat to the music, I could easily envision many other vocalists fitting equally or better and more pleasantly to his music. This awkwardness is most noticeable on Too Many Kids Finding Rain In The Dust and Space Is Only Noise If You Can See. His voice gets by on Problems With the Sun, but only because it's pitched down so much, but to the point where I wonder if a simple baritone wouldn't have been a better fit. Whats worse, and has me skipping through these three songs, is that his lyrics are mere background at best and meaningless at worst.
The title track is most guilty, for it not only says nothing comprehensible - 'Space is Only Noise' - but it says it in a way that makes you feel stupid for not noticing - 'Space is Only Noise if you can see!' In fact the whole song speaks down at the listener about nothing really. I mean, I can see, and I don't see that space is only noise, and the other lyrics in the song don't help me to see that - 'watch your clock baby.. watch the weather on t.v.. grab a calculator and fix yourself'
So Jaar, do you mean:
a. that space is actually made of sound? That's debatable and a wild stretch looking at the other lyrics. Anyway, sound is just a spectrum of light, so the debate wont get far.
b. that noise creates space? That's a mere truism and goes without saying. And besides, deaf people cant hear noise yet can experience space.
c. that space is full of noise? This could be most true and most interesting, as a cubic centimeter of space is calculated to be loaded with an amazing amount of energy. But that interpretation doesn't fit the other lyrics (save for maybe the calculator bit). Also, space is not noisy unless noise is meant to be a synonym for the seemingly chaotic vacuum-photon fluctuations. But it is debatable how chaotic they actually are and more importantly if noise and chaos are really synonyms.
d. to make a juvenile joke about synesthesia patients, in that noise comes through the ears and sight comes through the eyes and space is mysteriously involved? If so this is not witty nor intelligent.
Either way, its a bad pick for the title track as it does not represent the album well, nor does it adequately showcase Jaar's musical talent. In fact, it's the worst song on the album.
Too Many Kids Finding Rain in the Dust seems to encounter similar lyrical problems upon analysis. But at least here the most plausible explanation for the lyrical strategy becomes obvious; it appears that Jaar is just trying to find words that fit best to the mood of song and not words that fit to the mood of the song AND are publicly meaningful. It is not hard to write poetic sentences that relate to the vibe of a song, and this is why it is boring - because its not special. It's much harder and more rewarding for both the artist and audience to create something that is intelligent, poetic and captures the music. And that might just be the difference between a superstar and a legend. A superstar's lyrics seem to blend into the noise of the immediate temporal space because the intended meaning is too relative and subjective to last. A legends' lyrics, on the other hand, actually say something publicly specific and so they stand out of and through time. If this rough scheme is at all true, lets just hope Jaar is not too enamored with the possibilities of the former to set focus on the latter.
For those of you in Berlin excited to see Jaar's live set tomorrow night at Watergate, a cautionary note is in order, lest you become pumped then deflated by the over hype surrounding his act. I saw him a few months ago and came home with mixed reviews. This time round I suspect he will try to work in some of the more dancier stuff from his new album and some of the hip-hop instrumentals he is now super into (*yawn* check his Beasts in Space mix below) - either of which I don't see making for a great club experience. Yet I could be very wrong. But naturally I am curious, so let me know how it goes in the comments.
So Jaar, do you mean:
a. that space is actually made of sound? That's debatable and a wild stretch looking at the other lyrics. Anyway, sound is just a spectrum of light, so the debate wont get far.
b. that noise creates space? That's a mere truism and goes without saying. And besides, deaf people cant hear noise yet can experience space.
c. that space is full of noise? This could be most true and most interesting, as a cubic centimeter of space is calculated to be loaded with an amazing amount of energy. But that interpretation doesn't fit the other lyrics (save for maybe the calculator bit). Also, space is not noisy unless noise is meant to be a synonym for the seemingly chaotic vacuum-photon fluctuations. But it is debatable how chaotic they actually are and more importantly if noise and chaos are really synonyms.
d. to make a juvenile joke about synesthesia patients, in that noise comes through the ears and sight comes through the eyes and space is mysteriously involved? If so this is not witty nor intelligent.
Either way, its a bad pick for the title track as it does not represent the album well, nor does it adequately showcase Jaar's musical talent. In fact, it's the worst song on the album.
Too Many Kids Finding Rain in the Dust seems to encounter similar lyrical problems upon analysis. But at least here the most plausible explanation for the lyrical strategy becomes obvious; it appears that Jaar is just trying to find words that fit best to the mood of song and not words that fit to the mood of the song AND are publicly meaningful. It is not hard to write poetic sentences that relate to the vibe of a song, and this is why it is boring - because its not special. It's much harder and more rewarding for both the artist and audience to create something that is intelligent, poetic and captures the music. And that might just be the difference between a superstar and a legend. A superstar's lyrics seem to blend into the noise of the immediate temporal space because the intended meaning is too relative and subjective to last. A legends' lyrics, on the other hand, actually say something publicly specific and so they stand out of and through time. If this rough scheme is at all true, lets just hope Jaar is not too enamored with the possibilities of the former to set focus on the latter.
For those of you in Berlin excited to see Jaar's live set tomorrow night at Watergate, a cautionary note is in order, lest you become pumped then deflated by the over hype surrounding his act. I saw him a few months ago and came home with mixed reviews. This time round I suspect he will try to work in some of the more dancier stuff from his new album and some of the hip-hop instrumentals he is now super into (*yawn* check his Beasts in Space mix below) - either of which I don't see making for a great club experience. Yet I could be very wrong. But naturally I am curious, so let me know how it goes in the comments.
Post-Script
Space is Only Noise Circus Company Press Release
Nicolas Jaar on Beats in Space Radio, Nov 30, 2011
Matthew Dear - You Put A Smell On Me (Nicolas Jaar Remix)
Clown and Sunset Podcast 003
I offer an alternative interpretation of the title 'Space is Only Noise.' There is often background "noise" we are subject to wherever we go. It's a fact of life and we ignore it. 'Space is Only Noise if you can see' may refer to the fact that if you can see, the stars are, for the most part inconsequential and insignificant against their vast backdrop, nothing but background noise. A lot like "snow" on an analog TV that has a bad signal.
ReplyDeletei fuck with that heavy
DeleteNicolas who?
ReplyDelete" sound is just a spectrum of light " you say, that's not true, sound is a wave, light is neither a wave nor a particle but undergoes an wave-particle duality.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I think view A may come closest to my own interpretation. A person who cannot see has a very sensitive feeling for space, I for instance, can hear whether im on the toilet or inside a church, but a deaf person makes far more use of the "noises" he hears to locate himself. Noise in this case would be the changes of sounds through reflection, refraction, changing of pitch etc.
So if you can see, noise would be defined as noise, but if you cannot see, the noise could be much more than just noise, but makes the space around an individual.
I think space is a metaphor for chaos, so he"s saying that space is ultimately chaos if you are able to see: to understand what happens all around you
ReplyDeleteI completely disagree with you opinion of 'Space is only Noise' being meaningless. As a matter of fact, I even think it has a Physics backround for it. I saw him live yesterday and listening to the lyrics and watching how he played with light and smoke, creating kind of light-cones, it reminded me of how Einstein's General Relativity reduced Spave and Time into a single entity (spacetime) and how mass and energy can disrupt and deform that space. However, those spacetime effects cannot be 'felt' with our senses (if you can see; for example) you must go to the theory and 'grab a calculator' to fix your perception of reality. Our perception of space and time is actually distorted, or as Nico calls it: noise.
ReplyDelete